Skip to content

Causal Structure and the Cylinder

Anti-de Sitter space is not just a negatively curved spacetime. It is a spacetime with a timelike conformal boundary. Light rays can reach the boundary in finite global coordinate time, even though the boundary is infinitely far away in physical proper distance. This single fact is responsible for several features that are easy to underestimate:

  • AdS is not globally hyperbolic unless boundary conditions are specified.
  • Bulk fields have a discrete global normal-mode spectrum in empty global AdS.
  • Boundary time evolution is naturally the Hamiltonian evolution of the CFT on Sd1S^{d-1}.
  • Boundary conditions at infinity are not optional technicalities; they are part of the definition of the theory.

The slogan is:

global AdS is a gravitational box.\text{global AdS is a gravitational box.}

The box is not made of a hard wall in the interior. It is made of the conformal boundary and the boundary conditions imposed there.

Global AdS and its conformal compactification

Section titled “Global AdS and its conformal compactification”

The global AdSd+1_{d+1} metric can be written as

ds2=L2[cosh2ρdτ2+dρ2+sinh2ρdΩd12],0ρ<.ds^2 = L^2\left[-\cosh^2\rho\, d\tau^2+d\rho^2+\sinh^2\rho\,d\Omega_{d-1}^2\right], \qquad 0\le \rho<\infty .

It is often better for causal questions to use a compact radial coordinate χ\chi defined by

tanχ=sinhρ,0χ<π2.\tan\chi=\sinh\rho, \qquad 0\le \chi<\frac{\pi}{2}.

Then

ds2=L2cos2χ[dτ2+dχ2+sin2χdΩd12].ds^2 = \frac{L^2}{\cos^2\chi} \left[-d\tau^2+d\chi^2+ \sin^2\chi\,d\Omega_{d-1}^2\right].

The conformally related metric

ds~2=dτ2+dχ2+sin2χdΩd12d\widetilde s^2 = -d\tau^2+d\chi^2+ \sin^2\chi\,d\Omega_{d-1}^2

has a boundary at χ=π/2\chi=\pi/2. This boundary has induced conformal metric

ds~2=dτ2+dΩd12.d\widetilde s^2_{\partial} = -d\tau^2+d\Omega_{d-1}^2.

Thus the conformal boundary of global AdSd+1_{d+1} is the cylinder

Rτ×Sd1.\mathbb R_\tau\times S^{d-1}.

The CFT naturally lives on this cylinder. The generator of translations in τ\tau is the CFT Hamiltonian on Sd1S^{d-1}.

Conformal cylinder of global AdS showing timelike boundaries, radial null rays, and reflections from the boundary.

In conformal coordinates, radial null rays satisfy dτ=±dχd\tau=\pm d\chi and reach the boundary at χ=π/2\chi=\pi/2 in finite global time. The timelike AdS boundary requires boundary conditions; with reflecting boundary conditions, perturbations return to the bulk.

The hyperboloid definition of AdS contains a periodic global time coordinate. The embedded hyperboloid has closed timelike curves if this periodicity is kept. The physical spacetime used in AdS/CFT is the universal cover of the hyperboloid, obtained by unwrapping the time coordinate:

τR.\tau\in\mathbb R.

When people say “global AdS,” they almost always mean this universal covering space. This is not a pedantic distinction. The boundary cylinder is R×Sd1\mathbb R\times S^{d-1}, not S1×Sd1S^1\times S^{d-1}, unless one has explicitly Wick-rotated or thermally identified time.

For radial null motion in the conformally compactified metric,

dΩd1=0,0=dτ2+dχ2.d\Omega_{d-1}=0, \qquad 0=-d\tau^2+d\chi^2.

Therefore

dχdτ=±1.\frac{d\chi}{d\tau}=\pm 1.

A radial null ray sent from the center χ=0\chi=0 at time τ=0\tau=0 reaches the boundary at

Δτ=π2.\Delta\tau=\frac{\pi}{2}.

A reflected ray returns to the center after an additional interval π/2\pi/2. Thus a complete center-boundary-center trip takes

Δτ=π.\Delta\tau=\pi.

This is the simplest way to see that global AdS behaves like a finite causal box.

At the same time, the physical proper radial distance to the boundary is infinite:

=L0π/2dχcosχ=.\ell = L\int_0^{\pi/2}\frac{d\chi}{\cos\chi} =\infty .

So there is no contradiction. The boundary is infinitely far in the physical metric, but it is at finite location in the conformal metric that controls causal diagrams.

The conformal boundary metric is Lorentzian:

ds~2=dτ2+dΩd12.d\widetilde s^2_{\partial} = -d\tau^2+d\Omega_{d-1}^2.

This means the boundary itself has a time direction. Signals can arrive at the boundary, interact with boundary conditions, and return. This is very different from asymptotically flat spacetime, where null infinity is null, and from de Sitter spacetime, where future infinity is spacelike.

The timelike nature of the boundary is the reason that an initial data surface in the bulk is not enough to determine future evolution. One must also state what happens when waves reach infinity.

A spacetime is globally hyperbolic if appropriate initial data on a Cauchy surface determine the solution everywhere. Empty AdS with no boundary condition at infinity fails this property. Initial data in the interior do not determine what boundary data might enter from infinity at later times.

For a field equation such as

(m2)ϕ=0,(\Box-m^2)\phi=0,

one must choose an allowed boundary condition at the AdS boundary. In holography, this is not an arbitrary mathematical afterthought. The leading near-boundary data are CFT sources, and the allowed variational problem specifies the dual theory.

In Poincaré coordinates,

ds2=L2z2(dz2dt2+dx2),ds^2 = \frac{L^2}{z^2} \left(dz^2-dt^2+d\vec x^2\right),

a scalar field near z=0z=0 behaves as

ϕ(z,x)=zdΔϕ(0)(x)+zΔA(x)+,\phi(z,x) = z^{d-\Delta}\phi_{(0)}(x)+z^\Delta A(x)+\cdots,

where

Δ(Δd)=m2L2.\Delta(\Delta-d)=m^2L^2.

For standard quantization, ϕ(0)\phi_{(0)} is the source for the CFT operator O\mathcal O, and AA determines the expectation value after renormalization. Choosing Dirichlet, Neumann, or mixed boundary conditions corresponds to choosing different boundary dynamics or deformations.

Reflecting boundary conditions and energy flux

Section titled “Reflecting boundary conditions and energy flux”

A useful intuition is that ordinary AdS boundary conditions are reflecting. Energy does not disappear through the boundary; rather, the boundary data define how the field is reflected back.

For a scalar field, the radial flux associated with the Klein-Gordon current is schematically

FΣdd1xγnM(ϕ1Mϕ2ϕ2Mϕ1).\mathcal F \sim \int_{\partial\Sigma} d^{d-1}x\sqrt\gamma\, n^M \left( \phi_1^*\nabla_M\phi_2- \phi_2\nabla_M\phi_1^* \right).

A well-defined self-adjoint time evolution requires boundary conditions that make the symplectic flux through the boundary vanish or match the chosen boundary dynamics. In AdS/CFT, turning on a nonzero source is not “leakage” in the same sense; it is changing the boundary Hamiltonian by adding

δSCFT=ddxJ(x)O(x).\delta S_{\mathrm{CFT}} = \int d^dx\, J(x)\mathcal O(x).

The important distinction is between a closed system with fixed boundary sources and a driven system with time-dependent boundary sources.

Because global AdS acts like a box, free fields have discrete normal modes. For a scalar field of dimension Δ\Delta in global AdSd+1_{d+1}, regularity at the origin and standard boundary conditions give frequencies

ωn,=Δ++2n,n=0,1,2,,=0,1,2,.\omega_{n,\ell} = \Delta+\ell+2n, \qquad n=0,1,2,\ldots, \qquad \ell=0,1,2,\ldots .

This spectrum has a direct CFT interpretation. The state created by a primary operator O\mathcal O on the cylinder has energy

EO=Δ,E_{\mathcal O}=\Delta,

and descendants have energies shifted by integers. The global AdS spectrum is therefore not a random property of a curved box. It is the bulk representation of radial quantization in the CFT.

This is one of the cleanest examples of how geometry and CFT representation theory fit together:

global AdS energyCFT scaling dimension.\text{global AdS energy} \quad\longleftrightarrow\quad \text{CFT scaling dimension}.

The Poincaré metric

ds2=L2z2(dz2dt2+dx2)ds^2 = \frac{L^2}{z^2} \left(dz^2-dt^2+d\vec x^2\right)

covers only a patch of global AdS. Its boundary is conformal to Minkowski space rather than the full cylinder. It is perfect for CFT on R1,d1\mathbb R^{1,d-1}, scattering-like correlators, black branes, and finite-density systems.

But not all global causal questions are visible in one Poincaré patch. For example, a null ray can pass through the Poincaré horizon and still remain in global AdS. The Poincaré horizon is a coordinate horizon of the patch, not necessarily a physical black-hole horizon.

This is a recurring theme:

coordinate patch horizonevent horizon of a black hole.\text{coordinate patch horizon} \ne \text{event horizon of a black hole}.

The distinction matters in real-time holography. In empty Poincaré AdS, the deep interior condition is usually regularity or normalizability. In an AdS black brane, the future horizon condition for retarded correlators is infalling regularity.

AdS/CFT also imposes constraints on how fast bulk signals can connect boundary points. In pure AdS, null geodesics through the bulk connect boundary points at the same causal speed as boundary null geodesics. In physically reasonable asymptotically AdS spacetimes obeying suitable energy conditions, the bulk should not allow boundary observers to send signals faster than allowed by the boundary CFT causal structure.

This idea is often called boundary causality. Violations of boundary causality are strong evidence that a proposed bulk effective theory is inconsistent or requires additional degrees of freedom, higher-derivative corrections, or modified boundary conditions.

The moral is sharp: the boundary CFT has an exact causal structure, and the bulk is not allowed to beat it.

The cylinder Hamiltonian and radial quantization

Section titled “The cylinder Hamiltonian and radial quantization”

A CFT on flat Euclidean space can be mapped to a theory on the cylinder by writing

xμ=rnμ,r=eτ,x^\mu=r n^\mu, \qquad r=e^\tau,

where nμn^\mu is a point on Sd1S^{d-1}. Under this conformal map,

Rd{0}Rτ×Sd1.\mathbb R^d\setminus\{0\} \simeq \mathbb R_\tau\times S^{d-1}.

Dilatations on flat space become time translations on the cylinder. A primary operator of dimension Δ\Delta creates a cylinder state of energy Δ\Delta:

O(0)0O,HcylO=ΔO.\mathcal O(0)|0\rangle \quad\longleftrightarrow\quad |\mathcal O\rangle, \qquad H_{\mathrm{cyl}}|\mathcal O\rangle=\Delta |\mathcal O\rangle.

This is why global AdS is so natural for spectroscopy. Bulk energy in global time is matched to CFT scaling dimension.

Confusing infinite proper distance with infinite causal time

Section titled “Confusing infinite proper distance with infinite causal time”

The AdS boundary is infinitely far in the physical metric. But after conformal compactification, null rays reach it in finite global coordinate time. Causal diagrams use the conformal metric, not physical proper distance.

AdS by itself is not a complete initial value problem. Boundary conditions at infinity are part of the definition of the theory. In holography, they encode CFT sources, deformations, and quantization choices.

Treating the Poincaré horizon as a black-hole horizon

Section titled “Treating the Poincaré horizon as a black-hole horizon”

The Poincaré patch has a coordinate horizon. It is not the same thing as the event horizon of a thermal black brane. The boundary conditions used at the two horizons have different physical meanings.

The original hyperboloid has closed timelike curves because global time is periodic. The AdS spacetime used in holography is the universal cover with unwrapped time.

Assuming all AdS boundary conditions are Dirichlet

Section titled “Assuming all AdS boundary conditions are Dirichlet”

Standard quantization uses Dirichlet-like source fixing, but alternate and mixed boundary conditions are important, especially in the Breitenlohner-Freedman window and in multi-trace deformations.

Using the conformal global metric

ds~2=dτ2+dχ2+sin2χdΩd12,d\widetilde s^2=-d\tau^2+d\chi^2+ \sin^2\chi\,d\Omega_{d-1}^2,

show that a radial null ray sent from the center χ=0\chi=0 reaches the boundary χ=π/2\chi=\pi/2 after global time Δτ=π/2\Delta\tau=\pi/2.

Solution

For a radial null ray, dΩd1=0d\Omega_{d-1}=0 and ds~2=0d\widetilde s^2=0. Hence

0=dτ2+dχ2,0=-d\tau^2+d\chi^2,

so

dχdτ=±1.\frac{d\chi}{d\tau}=\pm1.

For an outgoing ray from χ=0\chi=0 to χ=π/2\chi=\pi/2,

Δτ=0π/2dχ=π2.\Delta\tau = \int_0^{\pi/2}d\chi =\frac{\pi}{2}.

Show that the physical proper radial distance from the center of global AdS to the boundary is infinite, even though the conformal coordinate range is finite.

Solution

At fixed τ\tau and fixed angles,

ds=Lcosχdχ.ds = \frac{L}{\cos\chi}d\chi.

Therefore

=L0π/2dχcosχ.\ell = L\int_0^{\pi/2}\frac{d\chi}{\cos\chi}.

The integrand diverges as χπ/2\chi\to\pi/2, since cosχ0\cos\chi\to0. Thus

=.\ell=\infty.

The conformal metric removes the divergent Weyl factor and reveals the finite causal coordinate distance.

Exercise 3: Boundary data and non-global hyperbolicity

Section titled “Exercise 3: Boundary data and non-global hyperbolicity”

Explain why initial data for a scalar field on a bulk spatial slice are not enough to determine the future solution in AdS unless boundary conditions are specified.

Solution

Because the AdS boundary is timelike, signals can enter the bulk from infinity. If no boundary condition is specified, future evolution can depend on arbitrary incoming data from the boundary, which are not contained in the initial data on the interior spatial slice.

A well-defined evolution requires a rule at the boundary: for example fixing the leading mode, imposing a normalizable condition, or imposing mixed boundary conditions. In AdS/CFT, these choices correspond to specifying sources, quantization, or deformations of the boundary theory.

Exercise 4: Normal modes and CFT dimensions

Section titled “Exercise 4: Normal modes and CFT dimensions”

A scalar field in global AdS has frequencies

ωn,=Δ++2n.\omega_{n,\ell}=\Delta+\ell+2n.

What is the CFT interpretation of the lowest mode with n=0n=0 and =0\ell=0?

Solution

The lowest mode has energy

ω0,0=Δ.\omega_{0,0}=\Delta.

In the CFT on the cylinder, a primary operator O\mathcal O of scaling dimension Δ\Delta creates a state with cylinder energy Δ\Delta:

O=O(0)0,HcylO=ΔO.|\mathcal O\rangle=\mathcal O(0)|0\rangle, \qquad H_{\mathrm{cyl}}|\mathcal O\rangle=\Delta|\mathcal O\rangle.

Thus the lowest global AdS mode is dual to the primary state; modes with larger nn and \ell correspond to descendants and angular excitations.

  • G. W. Gibbons, “Anti-de-Sitter spacetime and its uses,” arXiv:1110.1206.
  • A. Ishibashi and R. M. Wald, “Dynamics in non-globally-hyperbolic static spacetimes. III. Anti-de Sitter spacetime,” arXiv:hep-th/0402184.
  • S. Gao and R. M. Wald, “Theorems on gravitational time delay and related issues,” arXiv:gr-qc/0007021.
  • V. Balasubramanian, S. B. Giddings, and A. E. Lawrence, “What is a boundary theory?” arXiv:hep-th/9902052.
  • O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. Maldacena, H. Ooguri, and Y. Oz, “Large NN Field Theories, String Theory and Gravity,” arXiv:hep-th/9905111.