Skip to content

Supergravity p-Branes, NS5-Branes, and Throat Geometries

D-branes were introduced as hypersurfaces on which open strings can end. That is the weak-coupling, open-string definition. But a D-brane also carries stress energy and Ramond—Ramond charge, so it must source the closed-string fields of type II supergravity. At sufficiently large charge, the backreaction is not a small correction: the brane becomes a spacetime geometry.

This is the conceptual bridge from perturbative string theory to holography. Open strings tell us that a stack of NN Dpp-branes supports a (p+1)(p+1)-dimensional gauge theory. Closed strings tell us that the same stack sources a curved supergravity solution whose fields are controlled by a harmonic function Hp(r)H_p(r). The two descriptions are not competing stories. They are two limits of the same object.

The main character on this page is the extremal BPS pp-brane solution. It has a particularly rigid form because supersymmetry fixes the relative strength of gravity, dilaton exchange, and R—R gauge-field exchange. For a stack of coincident branes, the transverse-space harmonic function is

Hp(r)=1+Rp7pr7p,p<7,H_p(r)=1+{R_p^{7-p}\over r^{7-p}}, \qquad p<7,

where rr is the distance from the brane in the transverse space R9p\mathbb R^{9-p}. The constant RpR_p is the charge radius. When rRpr\gg R_p, the geometry is nearly flat. When rRpr\ll R_p, the constant 11 becomes negligible and the geometry develops a throat.

Extremal Dp-brane as a supergravity source

An extremal Dpp-brane is translationally invariant along x0,,xpx^0,\ldots,x^p and spherically symmetric in the transverse space R9p\mathbb R^{9-p}. Its geometry is controlled by a harmonic function Hp(r)H_p(r), and its R—R charge is measured by flux through the linking sphere S8pS^{8-p}.

Consider an infinite flat pp-brane in ten dimensions. It fills pp spatial directions and time, so the number of transverse spatial directions is

n=9p.n=9-p.

The brane is localized at y=0\vec y=0 in Rn\mathbb R^n. Away from the source, the fields are constrained by the sourceless supergravity equations. Supersymmetry reduces the coupled nonlinear equations to a remarkably simple statement: the function Hp(y)H_p(\vec y) is harmonic in the transverse space,

R9p2Hp(y)=0,y0.\nabla_{\mathbb R^{9-p}}^2 H_p(\vec y)=0, \qquad \vec y\neq0.

For a rotationally invariant solution, Hp=Hp(r)H_p=H_p(r) with r=yr=|\vec y|. The flat radial Laplacian in nn dimensions is

2H=1rn1ddr(rn1dHdr).\nabla^2 H={1\over r^{n-1}}{d\over dr}\left(r^{n-1}{dH\over dr}\right).

For n>2n>2, the Green function behaves as 1/rn21/r^{n-2}. Since n=9pn=9-p, this gives

Hp(r)=1+Qpr7p.H_p(r)=1+{Q_p\over r^{7-p}}.

The constant term is fixed by the boundary condition that the metric approaches ten-dimensional Minkowski space at infinity. The coefficient Qp=Rp7pQ_p=R_p^{7-p} is fixed by charge quantization. The same logic that gives the Coulomb potential in four-dimensional electromagnetism gives the D-brane harmonic function in the transverse dimensions.

For separated parallel BPS branes, the no-force property allows a multi-center solution,

Hp(y)=1+aQayya7p,H_p(\vec y)=1+\sum_a {Q_a\over |\vec y-\vec y_a|^{7-p}},

again for p<7p<7. This linear superposition inside a nonlinear theory is one of the most practical signatures of BPS saturation. The branes can sit at arbitrary positions because their attractive NS—NS forces and repulsive R—R forces cancel.

The harmonic function of an extremal brane

The harmonic function interpolates between an asymptotically flat region, Hp1H_p\to1, and a near-core region where Hp(Rp/r)7pH_p\simeq (R_p/r)^{7-p}. For BPS centers, harmonic functions can be superposed.

There are special cases. For p=7p=7, the transverse space is two-dimensional and the harmonic function is logarithmic. For p=8p=8, the transverse space is one-dimensional and the solution belongs to massive type IIA supergravity. The pages here will mostly use p6p\le6, with the D3-brane playing the central role later.

Let xαx^\alpha, α=0,1,,p\alpha=0,1,\ldots,p, be coordinates along the brane, and let ymy^m, m=p+1,,9m=p+1,\ldots,9, be transverse coordinates. Define

dx2=ηαβdxαdxβ,dx2=dymdym=dr2+r2dΩ8p2.dx_{\parallel}^2=\eta_{\alpha\beta}dx^\alpha dx^\beta, \qquad dx_{\perp}^2=dy^m dy^m=dr^2+r^2d\Omega_{8-p}^2.

In string frame, the extremal Dpp-brane solution is

dsstr2=Hp(r)1/2dx2+Hp(r)1/2dx2\boxed{ ds_{\rm str}^2=H_p(r)^{-1/2}dx_{\parallel}^2 +H_p(r)^{1/2}dx_{\perp}^2 }

with dilaton

eΦ=gsHp(r)(3p)/4\boxed{ e^{\Phi}=g_s H_p(r)^{(3-p)/4} }

and R—R potential, in a gauge regular at infinity,

C01p=gs1(Hp11).\boxed{ C_{01\cdots p}=g_s^{-1}\bigl(H_p^{-1}-1\bigr). }

The associated R—R field strength is electric with respect to the Dpp-brane,

Fp+2=dCp+1,Fr01p=gs1rHp1.F_{p+2}=dC_{p+1}, \qquad F_{r01\cdots p}=g_s^{-1}\partial_r H_p^{-1}.

A magnetic description uses the dual field strength Fp+2*F_{p+2}, whose flux through the linking sphere S8pS^{8-p} measures the brane charge. Schematically,

S8pFp+2=2κ102μpN,\int_{S^{8-p}} *F_{p+2}=2\kappa_{10}^2\,\mu_p N,

where NN is the number of branes and

μp=1(2π)p(α)(p+1)/2\mu_p={1\over (2\pi)^p(\alpha')^{(p+1)/2}}

is the R—R charge normalization appearing in the Wess—Zumino coupling μpCp+1\mu_p\int C_{p+1}. As on the previous D-brane pages, the gsg_s-independent DBI normalization is τp=μp\tau_p=\mu_p, while the physical tension measured at asymptotic string coupling gsg_s is

Tp=τpgs=μpgs=1gs(2π)p(α)(p+1)/2.T_p={\tau_p\over g_s}={\mu_p\over g_s} ={1\over g_s(2\pi)^p(\alpha')^{(p+1)/2}}.

For p<7p<7, charge quantization gives

Rp7p=cpgsN(α)(7p)/2,cp=(2π)5pΓ(7p2).\boxed{ R_p^{7-p}=c_p\,g_sN(\alpha')^{(7-p)/2}, \qquad c_p=(2\sqrt\pi)^{5-p}\Gamma\left({7-p\over2}\right). }

This formula is worth checking in the two most famous cases:

D3:R34=4πgsN(α)2,D5:R52=gsNα.\begin{aligned} D3:&\qquad R_3^4=4\pi g_sN(\alpha')^2,\\ D5:&\qquad R_5^2=g_sN\alpha'. \end{aligned}

The D3 case is special because the dilaton is constant. This is the first hint that D3-branes will produce a particularly clean holographic duality: the near-horizon geometry has constant string coupling and, for large gsNg_sN, small curvature.

The string-frame metric is the metric that appears directly in the sigma-model action of the fundamental string. The Einstein-frame metric is the one in which the gravitational action has the canonical Einstein—Hilbert form. If we normalize the two metrics to agree at infinity, then

gμν(E)=e(ΦΦ)/2gμν(str),Φ=loggs.g_{\mu\nu}^{(E)}=e^{-(\Phi-\Phi_\infty)/2}g_{\mu\nu}^{({\rm str})}, \qquad \Phi_\infty=\log g_s.

Using

eΦΦ=Hp(3p)/4,e^{\Phi-\Phi_\infty}=H_p^{(3-p)/4},

we obtain

dsE2=Hp(7p)/8dx2+Hp(p+1)/8dx2.\boxed{ ds_E^2 =H_p^{-(7-p)/8}dx_{\parallel}^2 +H_p^{(p+1)/8}dx_{\perp}^2. }

This form makes the universal BPS structure more symmetrical. The exponents add up in exactly the way needed for an extremal charged object in ten-dimensional Einstein gravity. The string-frame form is often more useful for worldsheet questions and T-duality, while the Einstein-frame form is often more useful for black-brane thermodynamics and comparisons with lower-dimensional gravity.

The distinction matters physically. For example, the D3-brane is self-dual in type IIB and has constant dilaton, so the string and Einstein frames differ only by a constant. For p3p\neq3, the dilaton varies with rr, and the local effective string coupling

geffstring(r)=eΦ(r)=gsHp(r)(3p)/4g_{\rm eff}^{\rm string}(r)=e^{\Phi(r)}=g_sH_p(r)^{(3-p)/4}

can become large or small near the brane depending on pp.

Near r=0r=0, HpH_p\to\infty. Hence

braneeΦ near the corep<3growsp=3constantp>3decreases\begin{array}{c|c} \text{brane} & e^\Phi \text{ near the core}\\ \hline p<3 & \text{grows}\\ p=3 & \text{constant}\\ p>3 & \text{decreases} \end{array}

This simple table is a useful diagnostic. D1- and D2-brane geometries become strongly coupled in the deep interior; their complete description requires S-duality or M-theory in the appropriate regimes. D4-, D5-, and D6-brane geometries have weak string coupling near the core, but their curvature and ultraviolet behavior still require care.

For p=3p=3, the solution becomes

dsstr2=H31/2dx1,32+H31/2(dr2+r2dΩ52),H3=1+R4r4,ds_{\rm str}^2=H_3^{-1/2}dx_{1,3}^2+H_3^{1/2}(dr^2+r^2d\Omega_5^2), \qquad H_3=1+{R^4\over r^4},

with

R4=4πgsN(α)2,eΦ=gs.R^4=4\pi g_sN(\alpha')^2, \qquad e^\Phi=g_s.

In the near-horizon region rRr\ll R, the constant 11 may be dropped:

H3R4r4.H_3\simeq {R^4\over r^4}.

Then

ds2r2R2dx1,32+R2r2dr2+R2dΩ52.ds^2\simeq {r^2\over R^2}dx_{1,3}^2+{R^2\over r^2}dr^2+R^2d\Omega_5^2.

This is AdS5×S5AdS_5\times S^5 in Poincare coordinates. The detailed holographic interpretation will be developed later, but it is useful to see already what makes the D3-brane special: the same radius RR controls both the anti-de Sitter space and the sphere, and the dilaton is constant.

The curvature scale in string units is

R2α=4πgsN.{R^2\over \alpha'}=\sqrt{4\pi g_sN}.

Classical supergravity requires

R2αgsN1.R^2\gg \alpha' \qquad\Longleftrightarrow\qquad g_sN\gg1.

At the same time, string loops are suppressed when

gs1.g_s\ll1.

Thus the most useful supergravity regime for NN D3-branes is

N1,1gsN,gs1.N\gg1, \qquad 1\ll g_sN, \qquad g_s\ll1.

This is the familiar large-NN, large ‘t Hooft coupling, weak closed-string coupling window.

D-branes are R—R charged. The NS—NS sector also has charged extended objects. The fundamental string is electrically charged under B2B_2, while the NS5-brane is magnetically charged under B2B_2.

The fundamental string solution in string frame has the schematic form

dsstr2=HF1dx1,12+dx2,e2Φ=gs2HF1,B01=HF11,\begin{aligned} ds_{\rm str}^2&=H_F^{-1}dx_{1,1}^2+dx_{\perp}^2,\\ e^{2\Phi}&=g_s^2H_F^{-1},\\ B_{01}&=H_F^{-1}-1, \end{aligned}

where HF=1+QF/r6H_F=1+Q_F/r^6 in the eight transverse dimensions. This is the NS—NS analogue of an electrically charged brane.

The magnetic dual is the NS5-brane. It fills x0,,x5x^0,\ldots,x^5 and has four transverse directions. Its string-frame solution is

dsstr2=dx1,52+H5(r)(dr2+r2dΩ32)\boxed{ ds_{\rm str}^2=dx_{1,5}^2+H_5(r)\left(dr^2+r^2d\Omega_3^2\right) }

with

e2Φ=gs2H5(r),H5(r)=1+Nαr2.\boxed{ e^{2\Phi}=g_s^2H_5(r), \qquad H_5(r)=1+{N\alpha'\over r^2}. }

The NS—NS three-form flux is magnetic through the transverse three-sphere:

1(2π)2αS3H3=N.\boxed{ {1\over (2\pi)^2\alpha'}\int_{S^3}H_3=N. }

Equivalently, if ω3\omega_3 is the volume form of the unit S3S^3, normalized by S3ω3=2π2\int_{S^3}\omega_3=2\pi^2, then in the near-throat region one may write

H3=2Nαω3.H_3=2N\alpha'\,\omega_3.

This flux is the NS5-brane charge. The harmonic function has the 1/r21/r^2 form because the transverse space is R4\mathbb R^4.

The NS5-brane is not merely the p=5p=5 member of the Dpp family. Compare it with the D5-brane. For a D5-brane,

eΦ=gsHD51/2,e^\Phi=g_sH_{D5}^{-1/2},

so the string coupling decreases near the core. For an NS5-brane,

eΦ=gsH51/2,e^\Phi=g_sH_5^{1/2},

so the string coupling grows near the core. In type IIB, these two solutions are related by S-duality. The Einstein-frame description is the natural place to compare them, because the Einstein metric is invariant under the SL(2,Z)SL(2,\mathbb Z) duality group.

The near-horizon region of NN NS5-branes is obtained by taking

rNα,H5(r)Nαr2.r\ll \sqrt{N\alpha'}, \qquad H_5(r)\simeq {N\alpha'\over r^2}.

Then the transverse part of the string-frame metric becomes

H5(r)(dr2+r2dΩ32)Nα(dr2r2+dΩ32).H_5(r)\left(dr^2+r^2d\Omega_3^2\right) \simeq N\alpha'\left({dr^2\over r^2}+d\Omega_3^2\right).

Introduce a radial coordinate ρ\rho by

ρ=Nαlog(rNα).\rho=\sqrt{N\alpha'}\log\left({r\over \sqrt{N\alpha'}}\right).

Then

Nαr2dr2=dρ2,{N\alpha'\over r^2}dr^2=d\rho^2,

and the near-horizon metric is

dsstr2dx1,52+dρ2+NαdΩ32.\boxed{ ds_{\rm str}^2\simeq dx_{1,5}^2+d\rho^2+N\alpha' d\Omega_3^2. }

The throat is a cylinder: Rρ×S3\mathbb R_\rho\times S^3, with the S3S^3 radius fixed by the number of fivebranes. The dilaton is not constant. Since

e2Φgs2Nαr2,e^{2\Phi}\simeq g_s^2{N\alpha'\over r^2},

we get

Φ(ρ)=Φ0ρNα\boxed{ \Phi(\rho)=\Phi_0-{\rho\over\sqrt{N\alpha'}} }

up to an additive constant. As r0r\to0, one has ρ\rho\to-\infty, so Φ+\Phi\to+\infty. The throat becomes strongly coupled at its bottom.

The NS5-brane linear-dilaton throat

The near-horizon NS5 geometry is a cylinder Rρ×S3\mathbb R_\rho\times S^3 times the flat six-dimensional worldvolume. The S3S^3 carries NN units of H3H_3 flux, while the dilaton varies linearly along the throat and grows toward the core.

This geometry is qualitatively different from the D3-brane throat. The D3 throat is anti-de Sitter and has constant coupling. The NS5 throat is a linear-dilaton background with a strong-coupling end. Its decoupled theory is not an ordinary local quantum field theory but a six-dimensional nonlocal theory known as little string theory.

Exact worldsheet description of the NS5 throat

Section titled “Exact worldsheet description of the NS5 throat”

The NS5 near-horizon throat is one of the rare curved string backgrounds that has an exact worldsheet CFT description. The geometry is

R5,1×Rϕ×S3,\mathbb R^{5,1}\times \mathbb R_\phi\times S^3,

and the S3S^3 with NN units of H3H_3 flux is described by a supersymmetric SU(2)SU(2) Wess—Zumino—Witten model. In a common convention one writes the throat CFT as

R5,1×Rϕ×SU(2)N.\mathbb R^{5,1}\times \mathbb R_\phi\times SU(2)_N.

There is a standard level-shift subtlety: the supersymmetric SU(2)NSU(2)_N theory can be represented as a bosonic SU(2)SU(2) WZW model at level N2N-2 plus three free fermions. This is why different books sometimes quote nearby-looking levels. The physical integer NN is the number of NS5-branes and the number of units of H3H_3 flux.

The central charge works beautifully. The supersymmetric SU(2)NSU(2)_N sector has

cSU(2)Nsusy=926N,c_{SU(2)_N}^{\rm susy}={9\over2}-{6\over N},

while the linear-dilaton boson plus its fermionic partner contributes

clin=32+6N,c_{\rm lin}={3\over2}+{6\over N},

in the common α=2\alpha'=2 worldsheet convention. Their sum is

cSU(2)Nsusy+clin=6,c_{SU(2)_N}^{\rm susy}+c_{\rm lin}=6,

which is precisely the central charge of four transverse supersymmetric coordinates. Adding the six flat worldvolume directions gives the critical type II worldsheet theory.

This exact CFT viewpoint explains why the NS5-brane throat is more than a supergravity approximation. The sphere radius and H3H_3 flux are not arbitrary classical decorations; they are encoded by the WZW level. The linear dilaton is also not a guess: it is required by conformal invariance.

A supergravity solution is useful only when both stringy and quantum corrections are small. There are two local conditions:

αR1,eΦ1.\alpha'\mathcal R\ll1, \qquad e^\Phi\ll1.

The first condition suppresses higher-derivative corrections. The second suppresses string loops. For Dpp-branes, the curvature radius is controlled by a charge scale RpR_p, so large gsNg_sN often helps. But the dilaton may still run, and for p3p\neq3 different radial regions can require different dual descriptions.

For NS5-branes, the sphere radius in the throat is

RS32=Nα.R_{S^3}^2=N\alpha'.

Thus large NN suppresses curvature corrections. However,

eΦgsNαre^\Phi\simeq g_s{\sqrt{N\alpha'}\over r}

in the throat, so string loops become important near r=0r=0 no matter how small gsg_s is at infinity. In type IIA, the strong-coupling core is better described by lifting to M-theory, where NS5-branes become M5-branes. In type IIB, S-duality maps the NS5-brane to a D5-brane, which may provide a weakly coupled description in the appropriate regime.

The practical lesson is not that the supergravity solutions are unreliable. Rather, they are reliable in their proper domains. The best string-theory calculations often proceed by patching together dual descriptions, each valid in a different region of moduli space or spacetime.

The essential facts are as follows.

ObjectHarmonic functionString-frame behaviorCharge
DppHp=1+Rp7p/r7pH_p=1+R_p^{7-p}/r^{7-p}ds2=Hp1/2dx2+Hp1/2dx2ds^2=H_p^{-1/2}dx_{\parallel}^2+H_p^{1/2}dx_\perp^2electric under Cp+1C_{p+1}
D3H3=1+R4/r4H_3=1+R^4/r^4constant dilatonself-dual F5F_5 charge
F1HF=1+QF/r6H_F=1+Q_F/r^6ds2=HF1dx1,12+dx2ds^2=H_F^{-1}dx_{1,1}^2+dx_\perp^2electric under B2B_2
NS5H5=1+Nα/r2H_5=1+N\alpha'/r^2linear-dilaton throatmagnetic under B2B_2

The Dpp solutions teach us that branes are not merely boundary conditions for open strings. They are charged gravitating objects. The NS5 solution teaches us that exact worldsheet CFTs can describe highly nontrivial curved backgrounds. Together, these examples prepare the ground for black branes, entropy, absorption, and the decoupling limits that lead to AdS/CFT.

Exercise 1: the radial harmonic function in R9p\mathbb R^{9-p}

Section titled “Exercise 1: the radial harmonic function in R9−p\mathbb R^{9-p}R9−p”

Let n=9pn=9-p and suppose H=H(r)H=H(r) is harmonic away from the origin in Rn\mathbb R^n:

1rn1ddr(rn1dHdr)=0.{1\over r^{n-1}}{d\over dr}\left(r^{n-1}{dH\over dr}\right)=0.

For n>2n>2, show that

H(r)=h0+Qrn2.H(r)=h_0+{Q\over r^{n-2}}.

Then rewrite the exponent in terms of pp.

Solution

The radial equation says

ddr(rn1dHdr)=0.{d\over dr}\left(r^{n-1}{dH\over dr}\right)=0.

Therefore

rn1dHdr=Ar^{n-1}{dH\over dr}=A

for a constant AA, so

dHdr=Ar1n.{dH\over dr}=A r^{1-n}.

For n2n\neq2,

H(r)=h0+A2nr2n.H(r)=h_0+{A\over 2-n}r^{2-n}.

Renaming Q=A/(2n)Q=A/(2-n) gives

H(r)=h0+Qrn2.H(r)=h_0+{Q\over r^{n-2}}.

Since n=9pn=9-p, the exponent is

n2=7p.n-2=7-p.

Thus the Dpp-brane harmonic function has the form

Hp(r)=1+Qpr7p.H_p(r)=1+{Q_p\over r^{7-p}}.

Exercise 2: D3-brane near-horizon geometry

Section titled “Exercise 2: D3-brane near-horizon geometry”

Starting from

ds2=H1/2dx1,32+H1/2(dr2+r2dΩ52),H=1+R4r4,ds^2=H^{-1/2}dx_{1,3}^2+H^{1/2}(dr^2+r^2d\Omega_5^2), \qquad H=1+{R^4\over r^4},

show that the near-horizon region rRr\ll R is AdS5×S5AdS_5\times S^5 with common radius RR.

Solution

For rRr\ll R,

HR4r4.H\simeq {R^4\over r^4}.

Then

H1/2r2R2,H1/2R2r2.H^{-1/2}\simeq {r^2\over R^2}, \qquad H^{1/2}\simeq {R^2\over r^2}.

Substituting into the metric gives

ds2r2R2dx1,32+R2r2dr2+R2dΩ52.ds^2\simeq {r^2\over R^2}dx_{1,3}^2+{R^2\over r^2}dr^2+R^2d\Omega_5^2.

The first two terms are the Poincare-patch metric on AdS5AdS_5 of radius RR, and the last term is the metric on a round S5S^5 of the same radius. Hence the near-horizon geometry is

AdS5×S5.AdS_5\times S^5.

Exercise 3: Einstein-frame exponents for Dpp-branes

Section titled “Exercise 3: Einstein-frame exponents for Dppp-branes”

Use

dsstr2=Hp1/2dx2+Hp1/2dx2,eΦΦ=Hp(3p)/4,ds_{\rm str}^2=H_p^{-1/2}dx_{\parallel}^2+H_p^{1/2}dx_{\perp}^2, \qquad e^{\Phi-\Phi_\infty}=H_p^{(3-p)/4},

and

gE=e(ΦΦ)/2gstrg_E=e^{-(\Phi-\Phi_\infty)/2}g_{\rm str}

to derive

dsE2=Hp(7p)/8dx2+Hp(p+1)/8dx2.ds_E^2=H_p^{-(7-p)/8}dx_{\parallel}^2+H_p^{(p+1)/8}dx_{\perp}^2.
Solution

The Weyl factor is

e(ΦΦ)/2=(Hp(3p)/4)1/2=Hp(p3)/8.e^{-(\Phi-\Phi_\infty)/2} =\left(H_p^{(3-p)/4}\right)^{-1/2} =H_p^{(p-3)/8}.

Multiplying the parallel part of the string-frame metric gives

Hp(p3)/8Hp1/2=Hp(p3)/84/8=Hp(p7)/8=Hp(7p)/8.H_p^{(p-3)/8}H_p^{-1/2} =H_p^{(p-3)/8-4/8} =H_p^{(p-7)/8} =H_p^{-(7-p)/8}.

Multiplying the transverse part gives

Hp(p3)/8Hp1/2=Hp(p3)/8+4/8=Hp(p+1)/8.H_p^{(p-3)/8}H_p^{1/2} =H_p^{(p-3)/8+4/8} =H_p^{(p+1)/8}.

Therefore

dsE2=Hp(7p)/8dx2+Hp(p+1)/8dx2.ds_E^2=H_p^{-(7-p)/8}dx_{\parallel}^2+H_p^{(p+1)/8}dx_{\perp}^2.

Exercise 4: the local string coupling near a Dpp-brane

Section titled “Exercise 4: the local string coupling near a Dppp-brane”

For the Dpp-brane solution,

eΦ=gsHp(3p)/4.e^\Phi=g_sH_p^{(3-p)/4}.

Assuming HpH_p\to\infty near the core, determine for which values of pp the local string coupling grows, stays constant, or decreases.

Solution

The behavior is controlled by the exponent

3p4.{3-p\over4}.

If p<3p<3, the exponent is positive, so eΦe^\Phi grows as HpH_p\to\infty. If p=3p=3, the exponent vanishes, so

eΦ=gse^\Phi=g_s

is constant. If p>3p>3, the exponent is negative, so eΦe^\Phi decreases near the core.

Thus

p<3coupling growsp=3coupling is constantp>3coupling decreases\begin{array}{c|c} p<3 & \text{coupling grows}\\ p=3 & \text{coupling is constant}\\ p>3 & \text{coupling decreases} \end{array}

This is why D3-branes are especially clean, while D1/D2 systems and D4/D5/D6 systems often require dual descriptions in different regimes.

Starting from

ds2=dx1,52+H5(r)(dr2+r2dΩ32),H5(r)=1+Nαr2,ds^2=dx_{1,5}^2+H_5(r)(dr^2+r^2d\Omega_3^2), \qquad H_5(r)=1+{N\alpha'\over r^2},

show that for rNαr\ll\sqrt{N\alpha'} the metric becomes

ds2dx1,52+dρ2+NαdΩ32ds^2\simeq dx_{1,5}^2+d\rho^2+N\alpha' d\Omega_3^2

with

ρ=Nαlog(rNα).\rho=\sqrt{N\alpha'}\log\left({r\over\sqrt{N\alpha'}}\right).

Then derive the linear dilaton.

Solution

In the near-horizon region,

H5(r)Nαr2.H_5(r)\simeq {N\alpha'\over r^2}.

Therefore

H5(r)(dr2+r2dΩ32)Nα(dr2r2+dΩ32).H_5(r)(dr^2+r^2d\Omega_3^2) \simeq N\alpha'\left({dr^2\over r^2}+d\Omega_3^2\right).

The coordinate definition gives

dρ=Nαdrr,d\rho=\sqrt{N\alpha'}{dr\over r},

so

Nαdr2r2=dρ2.N\alpha'{dr^2\over r^2}=d\rho^2.

Thus

ds2dx1,52+dρ2+NαdΩ32.ds^2\simeq dx_{1,5}^2+d\rho^2+N\alpha'd\Omega_3^2.

For the dilaton,

e2Φ=gs2H5gs2Nαr2.e^{2\Phi}=g_s^2H_5\simeq g_s^2{N\alpha'\over r^2}.

Using

r=Nαeρ/Nα,r=\sqrt{N\alpha'}\,e^{\rho/\sqrt{N\alpha'}},

we find

e2Φgs2e2ρ/Nα.e^{2\Phi}\simeq g_s^2 e^{-2\rho/\sqrt{N\alpha'}}.

Taking the logarithm gives

Φ(ρ)=Φ0ρNα,\Phi(\rho)=\Phi_0-{\rho\over\sqrt{N\alpha'}},

where Φ0\Phi_0 is an additive constant.

Exercise 6: NS5 charge from H3H_3 flux

Section titled “Exercise 6: NS5 charge from H3H_3H3​ flux”

Let ω3\omega_3 be the volume form on the unit three-sphere, normalized as

S3ω3=2π2.\int_{S^3}\omega_3=2\pi^2.

Show that

H3=2Nαω3H_3=2N\alpha'\omega_3

has NN units of NS5-brane charge under the convention

1(2π)2αS3H3=N.{1\over(2\pi)^2\alpha'}\int_{S^3}H_3=N.
Solution

Compute the flux:

S3H3=2NαS3ω3=2Nα(2π2)=4π2Nα.\int_{S^3}H_3 =2N\alpha'\int_{S^3}\omega_3 =2N\alpha'(2\pi^2) =4\pi^2N\alpha'.

Since

(2π)2α=4π2α,(2\pi)^2\alpha'=4\pi^2\alpha',

we get

1(2π)2αS3H3=14π2α(4π2Nα)=N.{1\over(2\pi)^2\alpha'}\int_{S^3}H_3 ={1\over4\pi^2\alpha'}(4\pi^2N\alpha')=N.

Thus the flux is precisely NN units.

Exercise 7: multi-center harmonic functions and no-force

Section titled “Exercise 7: multi-center harmonic functions and no-force”

Explain why

Hp(y)=1+aQayya7pH_p(\vec y)=1+\sum_a {Q_a\over |\vec y-\vec y_a|^{7-p}}

is a natural candidate for several parallel BPS Dpp-branes. What physical property of BPS branes makes this possible?

Solution

Away from all centers, each term

Qayya7p{Q_a\over |\vec y-\vec y_a|^{7-p}}

is harmonic in the transverse space. Since the Laplace equation is linear, the sum is also harmonic away from the sources. The constants QaQ_a encode the individual brane charges.

The nontrivial point is that this harmonic superposition solves the full BPS supergravity equations, not merely a linearized approximation. Supersymmetry enforces a balance between forces: gravitational and dilaton attraction are exactly canceled by R—R repulsion for parallel branes of the same orientation. Therefore the branes can be placed at arbitrary positions ya\vec y_a without acceleration. This no-force condition is the physical reason the multi-center harmonic function is allowed.